Published Aulterra EMF Research & Studies

DNA and cellular response

Several studies by Maria Syldona, PhD, and Glen Rein, PhD, examined human DNA under mobile-phone EMF. They looked at DNA renaturation: the process by which denatured (separated) DNA strands return to their double-helix configuration. In these in-vitro assays, DNA strands are typically separated first by heat shock as part of the test; the measurement is how well strands re-pair under each condition, not whether the phone alone denatured intact DNA inside a living cell. The typical design compared three conditions: no phone (baseline), phone without Aulterra, and phone with Aulterra present. Phone exposure alone altered renaturation compared with the no-phone control. With the Neutralizer present, renaturation matched the control again. In other words, the Aulterra compound appeared to neutralise the disruptive effect of the mobile phone EMF on DNA molecular behaviour. Aulterra summaries of this work report substantial reductions in DNA winding and unwinding in the cited in-vitro tests. These are in-vitro assays, not clinical outcomes.

Related studies: 2 · Syldona, 2007 — in-vitro DNA & radiation intensity·3 · Syldona — DNA changes mitigated·5 · Syldona — harmful DNA effects reversed

Heavy metals and cellular response

Glen Rein, PhD, and colleagues tested whether energy from the Aulterra mineral formulation could reduce the harmful effect of heavy-metal toxicity on DNA in vitro. The assay measured DNA rewinding after heat shock while DNA was exposed to heavy-metal stress with and without the mineral powder present. With the mineral energy present, DNA rewinding moved back toward baseline compared with heavy-metal exposure alone. The peer-reviewed publication reports this under heavy-metal toxicity; copper was used as a representative test metal in the assay. These are in-vitro laboratory tests, not human clinical outcomes.

In plain terms: laboratory tests asked whether the mineral blend's energy could reduce the harmful effect of heavy-metal stress on DNA. The published work reports that it did in those test conditions. That supports the heavy-metals story for Aulterra Enhance in those settings. These remain in-vitro laboratory findings — not a human detox trial.

Aulterra also reports a 1996 University of Idaho soil-recovery study in which Enhance powder was mixed into soil contaminated with lead and zinc. Pre-mix levels were 200 ppm lead and 26.8 ppm zinc; two days later, lead measured 0.5 ppm and zinc 6.5 ppm. That is environmental soil-recovery research — not a human detox trial — but it illustrates the same mineral line in a heavy-metal context. For how Enhance relates to daily wellness support, see Aulterra Enhance Powder and Enhance FAQs.

Related studies: 6 · Rein — DNA, radiated energy & heavy metals·5 · Syldona — harmful DNA effects reversed

Field signature and peak reduction

A second set of measurements looks at the phone's radiated output itself. Frequency-signature and magnetometer tests report that characteristic peaks are reduced (Aulterra summaries cite around 30 percent) and that prominent spike and shoulder patterns are smoothed, without blocking transmission. Rein also treats conformational DNA change as a marker of the energy radiated by the Aulterra formulation. This is why a basic home EMF meter often shows little change: it measures overall power density, not the fine structure of the signature.

Related studies: 1 · Syldona, Rein & Dandurand — rare-earth blend·2 · Syldona, 2007 — in-vitro DNA & radiation intensity·4 · Rein — radiation intensity reduced·6 · Rein — DNA, radiated energy & heavy metals

Human brain-wave testing

Lisa Tully, PhD, at the Energy Medicine Research Institute summarised independent EEG testing of slow cortical potentials (SCP) during mobile-phone use with and without Aulterra attached. Among subjects who responded to the phone's effect on SCP variance, protected (with Aulterra) readings returned close to baseline while unprotected (without Aulterra) phone use drove variance higher. In other words, phone use appeared to disturb brain-wave stability, and Aulterra brought readings back toward baseline in responders. The author describes the shift as dramatic. The document is a brief independent summary, not a large blinded trial, and it does not report sample size or formal statistics in the text.

Related study: 7 · Tully — slow cortical potentials (EEG)

Independent instrument testing

The International Institute for Research on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IIREC) used magnetometer grid mapping to test whether the Neutralizer equalises magnetic-field gradients around a mobile phone. With the Neutralizer applied, field coherence maps showed smoother lines of equal magnetic flux density than without it. Points of significant field-gradient disturbance were reduced across the test area. IIREC's overall disturbance index for the test field was 1.2 (their report treats values above 1.0 as effective equalisation). In other words, the instrument data showed the Neutralizer smoothing disturbed field patterns around the phone, not removing the field at the device itself. This is independent magnetometer work on field structure, not a biological assay or clinical trial.

Related study: 8 · IIREC — magnetic field gradients